| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The 10/31 Project | ||||
| ||||
U.S. Increases Nuclear Energy Spending as It Fights Global Weapons Ban
-
Watch this video:
9 years ago
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Colbert Takes on Beck
No additional commentary needed - sit back and enjoy
Thursday, March 26, 2009
More from the group of NO
Same old; same old. All they really wanted to do was make the media swing away from PRESIDENT OBAMA [:-)] this morning.
The group of NO does it again! NO plan, NO anything -just some tired getting old white southern men who like to criticize because they have nothing to say that is worthwhile.
The group of NO does it again! NO plan, NO anything -just some tired getting old white southern men who like to criticize because they have nothing to say that is worthwhile.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
M. Bachmann - No Commentary Needed
Just watch - especially the faces of those being questioned :D - how they kept from giggling I do not know
[ht Kos/Time
[ht Kos/Time
Thursday, March 19, 2009
More on D's and R's and Thinking
Continuing with the discussion of R and D language and thinking styles.... an email to my Twitter pal David Sonnen
Yes Dems are more likely to aggregate - and that is why twitter is so popular among those who quickly get past the what are you doing nonsense. One thought can cross country and political barriers in a mini whatever - [a nanosecond? ] and get reflected and returned. I am learning so much on Twitter - chatted with a guy in Chicago and we discussed WWII and rivers. At the same time I was helping another friend with an attorney referral and making jokes with yet another. Some I know are Dems - some I guess are Dems and the others? It doesn't matter - we communicate well and that's important to me.
The R's are also on Twitter but they still mostly post their bumper sticker thoughts on need only to go to #tcot and laugh.
McCain posted re his 10 worst pork projects and most treated it as a joke. There was an outrage about AIG bonuses and it gathered thoughtful steam on Twitter and on FB solely because we understand aggregation and two-way communicating that is not just shouting at each other - it's real people having real feelings and real thoughts and being able to express them succinctly - a mark in my opinion of intelligence [says she who wrote a very short thesis]
There are R's who "follow me" on Twitter and I ask why. Most then unfollow - but one said she felt we had much in common and we could learn from each other. At least she posts other than bumper sticker thoughts so we have communicated about no -political matters.
Now we have the group of NO telling Obama he ought to stay in DC and tend to the economy instead of going around talking to real US Citizens and I find that funny. The group of NO still has zero idea that D's can walk and chew gum so to speak or multitask and delegate - and then trust those to whom ones delegates...
The group of NO is used to doling out tasks to cronies who are not competent - how odd this new fangled thing called competence must seem to them. But when oyu bow down and worship a drug addict or a dry drunk - your thinking is hampered.
And that's again why Dems can aggregate and R's do sound bites.
Yes Dems are more likely to aggregate - and that is why twitter is so popular among those who quickly get past the what are you doing nonsense. One thought can cross country and political barriers in a mini whatever - [a nanosecond? ] and get reflected and returned. I am learning so much on Twitter - chatted with a guy in Chicago and we discussed WWII and rivers. At the same time I was helping another friend with an attorney referral and making jokes with yet another. Some I know are Dems - some I guess are Dems and the others? It doesn't matter - we communicate well and that's important to me.
The R's are also on Twitter but they still mostly post their bumper sticker thoughts on need only to go to #tcot and laugh.
McCain posted re his 10 worst pork projects and most treated it as a joke. There was an outrage about AIG bonuses and it gathered thoughtful steam on Twitter and on FB solely because we understand aggregation and two-way communicating that is not just shouting at each other - it's real people having real feelings and real thoughts and being able to express them succinctly - a mark in my opinion of intelligence [says she who wrote a very short thesis]
There are R's who "follow me" on Twitter and I ask why. Most then unfollow - but one said she felt we had much in common and we could learn from each other. At least she posts other than bumper sticker thoughts so we have communicated about no -political matters.
Now we have the group of NO telling Obama he ought to stay in DC and tend to the economy instead of going around talking to real US Citizens and I find that funny. The group of NO still has zero idea that D's can walk and chew gum so to speak or multitask and delegate - and then trust those to whom ones delegates...
The group of NO is used to doling out tasks to cronies who are not competent - how odd this new fangled thing called competence must seem to them. But when oyu bow down and worship a drug addict or a dry drunk - your thinking is hampered.
And that's again why Dems can aggregate and R's do sound bites.
Sunday, March 08, 2009
The Group of NO
This group used to be the GOP - Grand Old Party - now they are just old - they are not grand and they are not a party. They are mostly white, mostly southern and mostly addicted to Rush and to the word NO.
Every time President Obama [I'll never get tired of writing those words] has an idea - the group of NO goes on the air and yammers about nothing.
They lack ideas and when you lack ideas you are like the ugly American tourist who feels that yelling loudly in English will get you somewhere when you do not fathom the native language.
The current group of NO is is now saying President Obama should focus on the economy and not stem cell research. Huh? Like they can not be related? Why does one preclude the other?
Only the group of NO can come up with illogical conclusions - maybe that's due to their having lived for so many years under a pResident who could not hang two thoughts together at any one time let alone act on two at the same time.
Lest anyone forgets: democrats believe in education, research, science, citizens, rights, and the ability to think independent thoughts.
The group of NO can only say NO and so we will hear this again and again from the white male southerners in congress who have the letter r by their names.
But Dems are the party of YES - YES WE CAN and YES WE DID and YES WE WILL
Every time President Obama [I'll never get tired of writing those words] has an idea - the group of NO goes on the air and yammers about nothing.
They lack ideas and when you lack ideas you are like the ugly American tourist who feels that yelling loudly in English will get you somewhere when you do not fathom the native language.
The current group of NO is is now saying President Obama should focus on the economy and not stem cell research. Huh? Like they can not be related? Why does one preclude the other?
Only the group of NO can come up with illogical conclusions - maybe that's due to their having lived for so many years under a pResident who could not hang two thoughts together at any one time let alone act on two at the same time.
Lest anyone forgets: democrats believe in education, research, science, citizens, rights, and the ability to think independent thoughts.
The group of NO can only say NO and so we will hear this again and again from the white male southerners in congress who have the letter r by their names.
But Dems are the party of YES - YES WE CAN and YES WE DID and YES WE WILL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
