Thoughts about the McCain Marriage. Is it divorce if he loses?

Since last night's verbiage from Palin bored me after a few minutes - my brain started wandering and wondering...and It wound up putting a few thoughts together.

A McCain mansion is for sale...that is very odd given the housing market right now...but maybe billionaires are not bothered by this downturn.

Does it mean that McCain needs a cash infusion into his campaign right now? yup...he's created way around the public financing so money can go there - and he needs money badly!

Then there was my already posted idea that Palin is a trophy veep - and last night cement that idea - she's a good memorizer and parrotter...and cute - and young.....

BUT - why is McSame so so desperate that he is acting like an out of control child?

That's when it clicked!!!

Cindy must have told him she is fed up with him - his womanizing, his dislike of women except for yelling at and having sex with, his using her money for his lifestyle and campaigns...

I bet they have a solid prenup that cuts him off from her family money..

So - my best guess is that Cindy issued an ultimatum!

Cindy told John that if he did not win the presidency - she'd divorce him and leave him with whatever amount is in the prenup....

He likes her money - but does not like her - and so he is desperate to win this to keep his greedy hands on her money.

More news you won't get on TV

Good ole McSame

Mr. McCain, who with his wife, Cindy, has an adopted daughter, said flatly that he opposed allowing gay couples to adopt. “I think that we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don’t believe in gay adoption,” he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/us/politics/13mccain.html?pagewanted=print

Let's see - "both parents are important" - so important in fact that he ditched his first wife and their kids to have an affair with an heiress - got a marriage license to wed that heiress while he was still married to wife #1...and that heiress admits he was not always her for the family and/or her.

From the LA Times

In his 2002 memoir, "Worth the Fighting For," McCain wrote that he had separated from Carol before he began dating Hensley.

"I spent as much time with Cindy in Washington and Arizona as our jobs would allow," McCain wrote. "I was separated from Carol, but our divorce would not become final until February of 1980."

An examination of court documents tells a different story. McCain did not sue his wife for divorce until Feb. 19, 1980, and he wrote in his court petition that he and his wife had "cohabited" until Jan. 7 of that year -- or for the first nine months of his relationship with Hensley.

Although McCain suggested in his autobiography that months passed between his divorce and remarriage, the divorce was granted April 2, 1980, and he wed Hensley in a private ceremony five weeks later. McCain obtained an Arizona marriage license on March 6, 1980, while still legally married to his first wife.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-divorce11-2008jul11,0,2177702.story

Again I ask - does the still not recognize that facts stay facts - especially in court documents? or maybe he is counting on the pure laziness of most of the media to slip on by...he has a good thing going with the media as they fail to ask the most basic questions or do the most basic investigating.